Application of three kinds of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial / 中华儿科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation has increasingly been chosen as the primary ventilation mode in respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. In order to further understand the application of various non-invasive positive pressure ventilation modes, we compared the advantages and disadvantages of three modes as a primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with RDS.</p><p><b>METHOD</b>From December 2011 to March 2013, 107 preterm infants with RDS who received intubation-pulmonary surfactant (PS) -extubation in our NICU were randomly divided (by means of random number table) into three groups based on the primary mode of ventilation: nasal continuous positive airway pressure [NCPAP, n = 39, male/female ratio was 27/12, mean gestational age (GA) was (32.0 ± 2.1)weeks, mean birth weight (BW) was (1752 ± 457)g], bi-level positive airway pressure [BiPAP, n = 35, male/female ratio was 25/10, GA was (31.4 ± 2.0) weeks, BW was (1530 ± 318) g], and synchronized bi-level positive airway pressure [SBiPAP, n = 33, male/female rate was 25/8, GA was (31.5 ± 2.2) weeks, BW was (1622 ± 447) g]. Ventilation settings including FiO(2) were adjusted according to transcutaneous SPO(2) monitoring or blood gas analysis. Various settings and adverse events were recorded as well. The main parameter was the FiO(2) at 24 h post-positive-pressure ventilation. Statistical analyses were performed using χ(2) test, rank sum test, one-way analysis of variance for least-significant difference value, paired-sample t-test, two related sample Wilcoxon signed rank sum test and Logistic regression.</p><p><b>RESULT</b>The PaCO(2) (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa), oxygen index (OI) at 12-24 h, and FiO(2) at 24 h post-ventilation in BiPAP and SBiPAP groups were lower than that in NCPAP groups with significant difference (44 ± 9 and 45 ± 9 vs. 50 ± 9, 2.76 ± 0.96 and 2.79 ± 0.60 vs. 3.24 ± 0.72, 0.34 ± 0.10 and 0.35 ± 0.07 vs. 0.39 ± 0.07; F = 4.456, 5.146 and 4.123; P = 0.014, 0.007 and 0.019, respectively). There was no significant difference between BiPAP and SBiPAP groups. There was no significant difference among three groups (all P > 0.05) in the following events: respiratory index (RI) at 12-24 h post-ventilation, abdominal distension, period of non-invasive ventilation, ratio of intubation for invasive ventilation if failed noninvasive ventilation, air-leak syndrome, neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular-intraventricular haemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, mortality rate after 36 h of age or rate of abandon for discharge. The independent risk factors for failure of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation were gender, gestational age, antepartum steroid at 24 h before birth to 7 d, and birth weight, with the OR (95% confidence interval) being 14.120 (1.135, 175.662), 2.862 (1.479, 5.535), 61.084 (3.115, 1 198.031), and 8.306 (1.488, 46.383), respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>As the primary mode of ventilation in premature infants with RDS, both BiPAP and SBiPAP are more beneficial than NCPAP in improving oxygenation and reducing CO(2) retention without increasing the incidence of adverse events.</p>

Influence of insulin in all-in-one parenteral nutrition on blood glucose level in infants of very low birth weight / 中华全科医师杂志

Objective To investigate influence of exogenous insulin in all-in-one parenteral nutrition on blood glucose in infants with very low birth weight (VLBW). Methods Forty-two infants with VLBWI admitted to the department of pediatrics of Xuzhou Hospital affiliated to Southeast University during September 2005 to March 2009 were randomly assigned to Group Ⅰ ( n = 13 ) with exogenous insulin added to all-in-one parenteral nutrition at infusion rate of 0.4 U·kg-1·h-1,GroupⅡ(n = 13) with exogenous insulin at infusion rate of 0.1U·kg-1·h-1 and Group Ⅲ (n = 16) with no exogenous insulin added.Their blood glucose was monitored every two hours. Chi-square test was used for comparing difference in blood glucose abnormality between the three groups and association between blood glucose levels at admission and during hospitalization was analyzed with Spearman correlation. Results Incidence of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia was 10. 9 percent (29/265) and 18. 1 percent (48/265) in Group Ⅰ, 20. 8 percent (59/284) and 14. 1 percent (40/284) in Group Ⅱ , and 20. 5 percent (61/298) and 11.7 percent (35/298) in Group Ⅲ, respectively. There was significant difference in incidence of hyperglycemia between Groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ ( x2 = 9. 844, P = 0. 002 ) and between Groups Ⅰ and Ⅲ ( x2 = 9. 478, P = 0. 002 ), but no significant difference in it between Groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ ( x2 = 0. 008, P = 0. 928 ). There was significant difference in incidence of hypoglycemia between Groups Ⅰ and Ⅲ ( x2 = 4. 526, P =0. 033 ), but no significant difference in it between Groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ (x2 =1.653, P=0. 199) or between Groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ (x2 =0.709, P =0.400).No significant correlation between endogenous blood insulin level at admission and during hospitalization( r = 0. 082, P = 0. 661 ) was found. Conclusions Blood glucose in infants with VLBW can not be regulated timely by their endogenous insulin itseff. Exogenous insulin added to all-in-one parenteral nutrition at infusion rate of 0. 1 U · kg-1 · h-1 may not significantly reduce incidence of hyperglycemia,while incidence of hypoglycemia can be reduced by exogenous insulin at infusion rate of 0. 4 U · kg- 1 · h -1 that can increase incidence of hypoglycemia Therefore, exogenous insulin is not recommended to be prophylactically added to all-in-one parenteral nutrition for infants with VLBW.